FDI: Why Doesn’t South Africa Get Its Share?
The South African Consensus 
A Strategic One-day Workshop

Rosebank Hotel, Cnr. Tyrwhitt & Sturdee Ave, Rosebank

Johannesburg
Thursday, 26th August 2004

<<back to main archive 
Organised by Conference Host

Sponsors

 
 Anglo American Corporation
   



UBS South Africa

Endorsed by

Event Overview

This workshop was based on the results of a domestic and international reader opinion survey which Omega conducted through our monthly electronic publication Africa Investor.  The survey was prompted by the fact that investment into South Africa – Africa’s most developed economy – during 2003 was a trifling US$1.1 billion, while outward investment was more than double that at US$2.4 billion (in comparison, Australia received in excess of US$11 billion over the same period).  The general view, confirmed by the World Bank’s latest Global Development Finance Report (2004), is that South Africa is not getting its share of FDI; and it is against this background that Omega undertook the survey to discover why.  The results of this survey were published in the July issue of Africa Investor, and are available here.

Using the survey results, the workshop was focused on the characteristics of the ideal FDI candidate country, South Africa’s areas of concern, and determined what needed to be done to improve South Africa’s attractiveness to foreign investors.  This therefore was a clearly focused and strategically important event, with outcomes that could be far-reaching for the South African and international business communities.

Post Event Media


Download post event media
here.  

Presenters Included

Dr Iraj Abedian, CEO, Pan African Advisory Council
Goolam Ballim
, Group Economist, Standard Bank Group
Peter Bruce
, Editor, Business Day
Stephen de Stadler
, Managing Director, Fitch Ratings South Africa
Kuseni Dlamini
, Manager: Human Resources, AngloGold Ashanti
Adv Anton du Plessis
, Head: Crime & Justice Programme, Institute for Securities Studies
Dennis Dykes
, Chief Economist, Nedcor Group
Ebrahim Fakir
, Senior Researcher, Centre for Policy Studies
David Gleason
, Publisher, Gleason Publications
Duma Gqubule
, Independent Journalist
Marlene Hesketh
, Head: Business Development, Rand Merchant Bank
Professor Brian Kantor
, Investment Strategist, Investec Securities
Ernie Lai King
, Director, Werksmans Attorneys Inc
John Loos
, Senior Economist, Absa
Leon Louw
, Executive Director, The Free Market Foundation of Southern Africa
Dr Xolela Mangcu
, Executive Director, The Steve Biko Foundation
Dr Greg Mills
, National Director, South African Institute of International Affairs
Dr Monde Mnyande
, Senior Chief Economist, South African Reserve Bank
Lumkile Mondi
, Chief Economist, IDC
Chris Niehaus
, Executive Director & Head of Corporate Finance, UBS South Africa
Dr Essop Pahad
, Minister in the Presidency
Tyrone Seale
, Head: Communications Resource Centre, International Marketing Council
Michael Spicer
, Executive Vice-President: Corporate Affairs, Anglo American Corporation
Pieter Steyn
, Director, Werksmans Attorneys Inc
Johan van den Heever
, Head: Financial Analysis & Public Finance Research, 
South African Reserve Bank
Kobus van der Wath
, Managing Director, The Beijing Axis
Professor David Welsh
, Political Analyst, Omega Investment Research


For further information please contact
Kristen Tremeer on tel: +27 (0)21 689 7881 or
e-mail kristent@omegainvest.co.za

     

Business Day Article -  Thursday, 12th August 2004

By Denis Worrall  

It is general knowledge and also a matter of general concern that South Africa Africa ’s most developed economy – is not getting its share of FDI. According to one study, inward investment during 2003 was a trifling US $1.1 billion, whereas outward investment was more than double this at US $24 billion. By comparison, Australia received in excess of $11 billion over the same period.

Using an international and national network of some 7 000 contacts, we undertook a survey to determine what South Africa ’s strength and weaknesses are in attracting FDI. And having identified these factors, we are now looking at what needs to be done to improve the situation.

The ideal FDI candidate country will have the following specific characteristics. Firstly, it will have an economy of international scale (an economy "that matters.") Secondly, it will have political stability, which includes a high level of personal security; acknowledgement of property rights and the sanctity of contracts; maintenance of law and order; independent courts; a free information flow; and a social system with access to good schooling and healthcare, etc.

Secondly, the ideal FDI candidate country will have a public private sector relationship which is enabling. This means it will have a business friendly bureaucracy, with limited red tape and transparent government procedures; a well-defined regulatory system and transparent tendering procedures; an anti-corruption commitment and support for corporate governance, and an insistence on internationally acknowledged accounting systems.

Thirdly, aside from being big enough to matter from an international point of view, the ideal economy to attract FDI will have some or other core assets. For example it will be rich in natural resources, like minerals or oil or have a high tourist potential etc; large undeveloped internal markets or the potential to be a trade hub; in most instances access to the seas and the potential to be a platform for exports; a strong corporate governance culture; and well-developed modern internal and international transport and communications infrastructures. It will also have a strong business managerial core.

Fourthly, to attract foreign direct investment, a country needs to be seen to have a successful performing economy. Specifically, it will have a reputation for sustainable growth and profitability; a high level of economic growth (typically 5% of GDP or more); minimum prescription on how business should do business; a predictable currency; a positive balance of payments; internationally competitive inflation rates; the presence in the country already of successful major international investors; mobility of capital; and the cost of doing business will be internationally competitive

And finally, a country attracting FDI will project an image of success and of having a winning culture. Its government and domestic business sector will project confidence and work together in promoting international investment.

In terms of these criteria, how does South Africa rate on the survey we conducted?

A condensed version of the survey is contained in the attached box. South Africa is deemed to have a high level of political stability reinforced by the recent election (78%); our pressure groups are energetic, newspapers are free, and the courts are independent (something identified by The Economist) (85%); and 85% of respondents agree that South Africa is much freer and happier than it was 10 years ago.

Weaknesses as far as political stability is concerned are the HIV/AIDS scourge (92%) and high levels of crime (88%). 77% of respondents feel that South Africa is negatively affected by the African syndrome ("afro pessimism"); and no fewer than 84% feel that South Africa is not selling itself abroad.

In terms of our ideal FDI candidate country, South Africa scores well in infrastructure and size of country. 94% of respondents agree with a Commonwealth Report that South Africa is self-sufficient as far as most primary foods are concerned; and the low cost of electricity is a positive (82%). But we score very poorly on the survey in terms of the public private sector relationship. Thus 77% of respondents believe state plans for infrastructure development are hobbled by inefficient government delivery, in the form of lack of skills, project follow through, indecision, lack of experienced and trained personnel.

Brian Kantor, in a recent contribution to the economic debate on these pages, said that South Africa ’s main problem in drawing investment lies in its poor economic performance. This is distinctly borne out by the survey. While the survey identified certain strengths (fiscal policy, expressed in terms of the management of public finance and personal income tax) is regarded as excellent (69%); and 60% of respondents regard macro economic policy as internationally attractive, by contrast 88% see South Africa ’s employment rate as low.

In terms of international perceptions and the country’s image, the strengths are that South Africans are adaptable and flexible in handling new challenges (75%); and 85% agree with The Economist that South Africa is much freer and happier than it was 10 years ago. There is also a positive reaction to NEPAD which, according to a Commonwealth Report, is "increasing recognition that taking local responsibility for getting the conditions right is the key to pulling in private capital resources" (65%).

Weaknesses in the country’s image are the brain drain (75%); and no fewer than 84% respondents agree with the Commonwealth Report that events in Zimbabwe negatively impact on South Africa . Yet there is hope. 84% feel that South Africa is not selling itself abroad and that our embassies can do better. According to the Institute for Management Development of Lausanne, "people don’t know about South Africa."

As a follow-up to the survey, Omega is organizing a strategic workshop in Johannesburg on 26 August, when some of the country’s top business minds (using the survey as a basis) will try to answer the question – FDI: What needs to be done? For details of this workshop contact Kristen or Liezel on 021 689-7881 or go to our website www.omegaconferences.com  

Copyright © Omega Investment Research (Pty) Ltd, 2003